Skip to content
Luna Academy

Universe and global climate — Advanced

Score: 0 / 10

Level 3: Advanced

Evaluate, justify, synthesise, propose — combine ideas, judge claims and methods (senior secondary style).

  1. A commentator claims: The Big Bang is “just a guess” because nobody was there. The best scientific evaluation is:

  2. Evaluate: Because one climate model simplified cloud physics, all modelling of future warming is worthless.

  3. A student argues we should ignore human-caused greenhouse gas trends because weather was cold last week. The best critique is:

  4. To justify using both models and observations for climate, a scientist would most likely say:

  5. Evaluate “If models disagree on cloud feedback, we know nothing about future warming.”

  6. Synthesise how biosphere and atmosphere exchanges matter for interannual CO₂ growth rate:

  7. Critique using a cold winter in one region as proof that global warming has stopped:

  8. Justify teaching Big Bang as a model rather than a casual guess:

  9. A student claims dark energy is “proved” because one team measured accelerating expansion. The best classroom response is:

  10. Propose why paleoclimate proxies (ice cores, sediments) complement instrumental records:

← Back to hub