Appearance
Universe and global climate — Advanced
Level 3: Advanced
Evaluate, justify, synthesise, propose — combine ideas, judge claims and methods (senior secondary style).
A commentator claims: The Big Bang is “just a guess” because nobody was there. The best scientific evaluation is:
Evaluate: Because one climate model simplified cloud physics, all modelling of future warming is worthless.
A student argues we should ignore human-caused greenhouse gas trends because weather was cold last week. The best critique is:
To justify using both models and observations for climate, a scientist would most likely say:
Evaluate “If models disagree on cloud feedback, we know nothing about future warming.”
Synthesise how biosphere and atmosphere exchanges matter for interannual CO₂ growth rate:
Critique using a cold winter in one region as proof that global warming has stopped:
Justify teaching Big Bang as a model rather than a casual guess:
A student claims dark energy is “proved” because one team measured accelerating expansion. The best classroom response is:
Propose why paleoclimate proxies (ice cores, sediments) complement instrumental records: